However, the fast Sony lenses that I would need to replace my DSLR equivalents are just as heavy and bulky. Sure, the Sony A7R III is smaller and lighter than any of the Canon 5D cameras. The argument of switching to mirrorless cameras to have a smaller and lighter system compared to DSLRs isn’t completely true. Look at the height of that stage – I couldn’t get this shot without the tilting LCD. The only thing to note is that silent shutters on mirrorless cameras can produce banding in images where LED lights are present, so be wary of that. For the effort that Canon makes to offer a “silent shutter” on its DSLRs, it’s still a jarring sound compared to a mirrorless camera’s silent shutter. A truly silent shutterĪnother advantage of mirrorless cameras is that they can have truly silent shutters. Shooting with a tilting LCD has been a complete gamechanger, allowing me to find creative compositions that I wouldn’t have been able to do with a DSLR. For me, the EVF is preferred mainly because it allows for composing and shooting still photos with the LCD – something that is still hard to do with a DSLR. There are pros and cons to using an EVF over an OVF, and most people prefer one over the other. An EVF shows you almost exactly what your final image will look like before you press the shutter button. An OVF shows you what the camera lens sees, while an EVF shows you what the camera sensor sees.
One of the ways mirrorless cameras differ from DSLRs is that they tend to have an electronic viewfinder (EVF), while DSLRs have optical viewfinders (OVF). So from a video perspective, the Sony A7R III was completely worth it.
But the specs are more than what the newer Canon 5D Mark IV offers. Since this is a photography site, I won’t go on more about the video features.
The Sony A7R III and A7 III are packed with video features including the ability to shoot in 4K resolution, 120 fps slow motion, in-camera timelapse, and in-body-stabilization (IBIS), to name a few. *The overlapping 24-70mm lenses might seem like overkill, but there is such a HUGE size difference between the two. In the end, here’s what my resulting camera kit looked like: Given the significantly higher prices of Sony lenses, it made more financial sense to keep the DSLR kit and simply purchase a couple of Sony lenses to use.
This worked with mixed results, but long story short, lens adapting did not work with my style of photography (more on that below). I have a large library of Canon L glass that I intended to use on the Sony via a lens adapter. I was also expanding my photography business to include video services and needed a camera that could shoot in 4K video resolution, which the 5D Mark III could not do. On both fronts, this tiny camera seemed lightyears ahead of my DSLR, so I was curious about how much better Sony’s full-frame cameras could be. Prior to the A7R III, I had been using the Sony a6300 and was thoroughly impressed with its autofocus capabilities and video features. There have been pluses and minuses to using both systems simultaneously, which I thought I’d share for those of you considering the switch.
#Best bokeh lens for sony a7riii professional#
Since then, I’ve used the two cameras side-by-side to shoot a wide variety of professional events, from concerts to food to corporate conventions. It’s been almost two years since I purchased the Sony A7R III mirrorless camera as a second body to my Canon 5D Mark III DSLR.
0 kommentar(er)
